Choosing Discrete-Event Simulation Software

Wayne Rogers

April 1, 1998

3 Min Read
Choosing Discrete-Event Simulation Software

Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry Magazine
MDDI Article Index

An MD&DI April 1998 Column


Steve Mallory, senior software specialist for 3M Health Care (Ann Arbor, MI), and Wayne Rogers, principal investigator for Rogers Medical (Temecula, CA), describe what to look for when choosing a discrete-event simulation software package.

How can a manufacturer determine what is the best discrete-event simulation software for the medical device industry?

No discrete-event simulation software package will be tailored specifically to the medical device industry—the software is made to be generic so it can be used in any industry, from automotive to nuclear power to manufacturing-floor production lines. However, several items should be examined closely before choosing a simulation software package.

  • The software package must have undergone rigid verification and validation, and the vendor should provide certification to that effect.

  • The software should include tasks robust enough to satisfy a wide range of events and operations, including queues, first-in/first-out or last-in/first-out lists, broadcast, signals, wait/delay/go, and randomness.

  • The software should contain a suite of report functions, statistical analysis functions, and graphical output/displays, including hard-copy and electronic versions.

  • The software should have sufficient throughput to accomplish end-to-end simulations in reasonable, if not real, time. Such simulations may include the assembly process of the manufacturing group; the device's hardware and software, and their interfaces; or the user interface of a device that accounts for key presses, debounce time, hardware response time, and software recognition and interpretation.

  • The software should interface with other external software packages. For example, it should produce data files or link to LabView (National Instruments, Austin, TX), test tools, and automated test suites such as Validor and Validor Gold (B-Tree Systems, Minneapolis). In addition, the simulator should be able to link to, call, or interface with software developed by the user.

  • The software should provide enough flexibility to be able to model patients and their physical attributes. For example, it should model blood pressure, body temperature, respiration, flows, blood chemistry, fluids, height, weight, and reach. This would be useful for modeling a patient using the device and a health-care provider operating the device.

  • Last and most important, the software must quantify time from hours to fractions of a second—the latter is particularly useful for simulating end-to-end processes.

Steve Mallory

Wayne Rogers

"Help Desk" solicits questions about the design, manufacture, regulation, and sale of medical products and refers them to appropriate experts in the field. A list of topics previously covered can be found in our Help Desk Archives. Send questions to Help Desk, MD&DI, 11444 W. Olympic Blvd., Ste. 900, Los Angeles, CA 90064, fax 310/445-4299, e-mail [email protected]. You can also use our on-line query form.

Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of this column, neither the experts nor the editors can guarantee the accuracy of the solutions offered. They also cannot ensure that the proposed answers will work in every situation.

Readers are also encouraged to send comments on the published questions and answers.

Copyright ©1998 Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry

Sign up for the QMED & MD+DI Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like