Sponsored By

AdvaMed's Ubl Straightens Out NYT Device CoverageAdvaMed's Ubl Straightens Out NYT Device Coverage

In an opinion letter, Stephen Ubl, clarified a few things the New York Times has gotten wrong about devices in its recent coverage. Ubl, who is the president and CEO of AdvaMed, said that the Jan. 15 article “Report Criticizes F.D.A.

January 24, 2009

1 Min Read
AdvaMed's Ubl Straightens Out NYT Device Coverage

on Device TestingâEUR incorrectly characterized the device review process as "lax."In the published letter, Ubl says:FDAâEUR(TM)s premarket review process involves extensive review of specifications and performance-testing information, and in many cases clinical data, before being made available to patients. For the higher risk devices, FDA requires comprehensive clinical data for approval.The Government Accountability OfficeâEUR(TM)s report on FDAâEUR(TM)s review process, the focus of the article, limited its comments primarily to a small subset of 20 devices that the FDA has yet to classify, not the review process as a whole.In fact, the GAO report demonstrates that FDAâEUR(TM)s process is working as intended so that all devices are subject to the appropriate level of regulation to ensure their safety and effectiveness.

Sign up for the QMED & MD+DI Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like