Feature

Published: August 30, 2012
Find more content on:
Famed VC Vinod Khosla on the Death of Medicine as We Know It

In a recent onstage interview at the Rock Health Innovation Summit with Wired editor Thomas Goetz, venture capitalist Vinod Khosla took on medicine's status quo, even likening traditional medical practice to witchcraft. 


“How many businesses do you know want to cut their revenue in half?” asked Vinod Khosla, a famous Silicon Valley venture capitalist at the Rock Health Innovation Summit in San Francisco on August 28. The healthcare system is understandably reluctant to do that, and for that reason, the status quo persists.

“The way to solve healthcare is not to boil the ocean,” mused Khosla. “There is another way: start a seed on the side that grows exponentially,” he said. “Innovation starts at the fringes.”

Khosla knows more than a thing or two about exponential technologies. He was a co-founder of Sun Microsystems, and, through his Khosla Ventures firm, now invests in everything from mHealth products like the iPhone ECG to social media and cloud technologies.

Vinod Khosla (on the right) told Wired's Thomas Goetz that, in contrast to most healthcare VCs, he looks at healthcare from the perspective of the consumer. 

If technology now makes it possible for cars to drive themselves, why can’t technology reboot the way medicine is practiced? In California, legislators have recently sent a bill to the governor’s desk that would green light the development of autonomous automobiles. “Driving a car from San Francisco to L.A. is an order of magnitude more complicated than a doctor diagnosing a disease,” Khosla told Wired executive editor, who interviewed him onstage at the event.

Earlier this year, in a piece titled “Do We Need Doctors Or Algorithms?” Khosla argued for the importance of artificial intelligence in medicine’s future.

At this event, he continued that thesis, stating that machine learning could enable robots to perform a large proportion of doctors’ duties. “Eventually, we won’t need the doctor,” he said. "Machine learning makes a better Dr. House than Dr. House," he later added, referring to the Gregory House, MD, the fictional genius physician of the TV series “House.”

“My willingness to fail is exactly what gives me the ability to succeed.”

Throughout his talk, he minced no words when it came to traditional medical practice, even comparing it to witchcraft. “[Doctors] do things because that is how things have been done,” he said. In the future, medicine will be based on probabilities.

New devices also will be substantially less expensive than legacy technologies, he said, pointing to the AliveCor iPhone ECG, which is “remarkably cheaper” than traditional clinical ECG units.

Khosla, who is an investor in the iPhone ECG, also used the device to illustrate the importance of software and hardware converging. In the future, lifescience companies won’t be able to choose between software and hardware—they’ll have to do both.

Khosla recommended that the entrepreneurs in attendance at the event be skeptical and not fearful of being perceived as wrong. “My willingness to fail is exactly what gives me the ability to succeed,” he said. “I don’t mind investing in something that has a 90% chance of not working but it has to have a real chance at making a big difference.”

He quoted George Bernard Shaw’s statement that: “all human progress depends upon the unreasonable man,” adding that “the reasonable people” do “all of the incremental stuff [in healthcare]. They will never do anything radical so the field is wide open.”

Brian Buntz is the editor-at-large at UBM Canon's medical group. Follow him on Twitter at @brian_buntz. He will be chairing the upcoming MedTech Cardio event held October 30 and 31 in Minneapolis. 

Related Content: 

 


Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)

Login or register to post comments

Khosla: how to build successful Health Tech start ups

I was in the audience when Vinod Khosla made his remarks. He clearly was trying to encourage the room full of young entrepreneurs, mostly from the technology side, to think outside the box to disrupt the healthcare delivery system. However his remarks may been taken to the extremes by saying doctors were practicing voodoo medicine. It is always true that the incumbents have major resistance to change in any industry. I have had the honor of working with several companies who changed the healthcare delivery by providing new tools to allow physician to practice differently. Although it may have taken a couple of years to go through the hospital selling cycle and justify the clinicians change of behavior, companies like VISICU, Pyxis and Nellcor, have shown that physicians will adopt products that improve workflow efficiencies, save healthcare cost and improve healthcare delivery. After having looked at over 400 companies in the last two years looking for angel money, we've seen at HealthTech Capital a pattern of very smart entrepreneurs coming from the technology side who do not understand how to incorporate physicians and other healthcare delivery professionals in their solutions. This is why we decided to organize the HealthTech conference on October 26 at UCSF to share with budding entrepreneurs lessons we have learned on how to build successful business within the new healthcare ecosystem.

This is nothing new, really!

Mr. Koshla is not telling us anything that careful analysis has not already revealed.

For many years, the holy grail in biomedical engineering was automating diagnostics – and we have made great strides in that area with physiological measurements and in vitro diagnostic devices. More recently, efforts have expanded to automating surgery – except that for legal liability reasons, wise manufacturers still want to keep the malpractice-paying physician in the loop! Putting the two together does not require a futurist or great visionary. I think Mr. Koshla’s contribution – and it is a significant contribution – is focusing our attention on the informatics (“big data”) requirements that are the major impediment to integrating and significantly advancing the automation of medicine and surgery.

Sure, he also annoyed or enraged (depending upon their level of insecurity) some medical practitioners, but so what? Professionals, tradesmen, and skilled craftsmen have been supplanted on a regular basis for the past millennium; why would you expect the future to be any different? And why get all hot and bothered, since you personally are not going to lose your job?

GM Samaras Pueblo, CO

Khosla's every bit the expert

Khosla's every bit the expert health care authority that Jim Clark is/was.

Cars driving themselves down the PCH is just the sort of rubik's cube tactical challenge the tech-absorbed turn into their model of life. The problem for Khosla, and for you, dear would-be health tech entrepreneur reader, is that health care is not analogous - enough.

On health care, respect - but ignore - Khosla.