MD+DI Online is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

When Is a Recall Not a Recall?

The Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN has an article about an interesting proposal from the Heart Rhythm Society, contained in its report discussed in this space earlier: Eliminating the word "recall" when advising the public about a medical device malfunction. The word "recall" tends to cause alarm because it implies that the product is unsafe and the problem is so serious that the product must be fixed or replaced immediately.

But as applied to devices, it just means that the device could fail, and may not imply that it is life-threatening. In non-life-threatening cases, the terms "advisory notice" or "safety alert" would be more appropriate, the report states. AdvaMed is on record as agreeing, and FDA says it will consider the proposal. It seems like a good idea provided that life-threatening problems are still reported with urgent language. Also of note is that the Star Tribune article did an excellent job of differentiating devices from drugs, which eludes much mainstream media coverage.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.