Survey: Medtech Companies Meeting Challenge of Ethics Standards 4295

May 1, 2007

2 Min Read
MDDI logo in a gray background | MDDI

BUSINESS NEWS

Results of a recent survey indicate that while medical device companies are making progress toward compliance with industry standards for sales and marketing ethics, they are also continuing to encounter challenges along the way.

The new survey is a follow-up to a 2006 survey among medical device companies that revealed overwhelming acceptance of industry's Code of Ethics on Interactions with Health Care Professionals. Industry association AdvaMed developed the code in 2003 in order to promote a high standard of ethical conduct by companies in the medical technology industry.

The 2007 survey benchmarks the code's effect on firms' internal operations and the challenges that medical device companies face in fully complying with the code's standards. The survey was conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (New York City) in conjunction with the law firm of King & Spalding LLP (Washington, DC) and Compliance-Alliance LLC (Arlington, VA). Results of the survey were presented at the Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement, and Compliance Congress, held on the campus of Harvard University at the end of March. Highlights of the survey results included the following.

  • Implementing the AdvaMed code had no negative impact on (82%) or actually improved (10%) most companies' financial results.

  • The AdvaMed code is of high or medium relevance in shaping compliance policies at 83% of respondents' companies.

Respondents cited several specific challenges to implementing a comprehensive compliance program, including the following.

  • The absence of clear, industry-specific guidance from regulatory and enforcement agencies regarding the legality of sales and marketing activities and other manufacturercustomer relationships.

  • Continued resistance from certain physicians and institutional customers against compliance with legal requirements and industry codes of conduct.

  • Lingering management questions regarding the business impact of tightening sales and marketing policies, particularly when the rules are unclear and competition is intense.

  • A belief that government agencies do not give sufficient credit to companies that adopt strong compliance programs that incorporate monitoring and auditing activities.

Bentivoglio

"The results of this survey demonstrate that device companies should pursue a two-track compliance strategy," said John T. Bentivoglio, cochair of King & Spalding's FDA and healthcare group. "Companies should work with AdvaMed and others to secure additional guidance from key regulatory agencies, while moving ahead on their own to address emerging sales and marketing risk areas, including educational and research funding, reimbursement support, and off-label promotion."

Sign up for the QMED & MD+DI Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like