In Advance of Safety Meeting, Patients Face Tough Choice

If you're a patient with a recalled device implanted in your body, do you expose yourself to risky surgery to remove it, or do you leave it in and hope for the best? A story in today's New York Times follows one patient as he goes through this decision-making process and ultimately has surgery to have his implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replaced. He is one of many patients affected by Medtronic's recall of faulty leads for its ICDs.

December 13, 2007

1 Min Read
MDDI logo in a gray background | MDDI

In fact, the issue with the Fidelis leads is the "most widespread problem yet involving a heart device," says the Times. Yet, the financial impact on Medtronic has been less than expected, because it moved so quickly to correct the problem, and because most doctors are recommending that the leads be left in place, with monitoring stepped up.This is why there's a very significant meeting going on today. CDRH officials, doctors, and representatives from device companies are meeting in Boston to discuss how components of heart devices are regulated and consider proposals about how heart devices should be approved and monitored. Expect some important recommendations to eventually emerge.UPDATE: According to a Wall Street Journal blog entry, the session focused on the inadequacy of lab tests to detect lead breakage and the infrequency of doctor reports about it. But there doesn't yet appear to be a consensus about what to do about these things.

Sign up for the QMED & MD+DI Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like