AdvaMed Speaks Out on "Comparative Effectiveness" PolicyAdvaMed Speaks Out on "Comparative Effectiveness" Policy

As legislation that could determine how CMS is allowed to use "comparative effectiveness research" is being debated, AdvaMed has come out with a series of principles that it would like to see the government adhere to. At their core is that such data, while it can be useful, should not take the place of doctor-patient counseling, and should not in and of itself be used to eliminate treatment options.

October 24, 2007

1 Min Read
MDDI logo in a gray background | MDDI

The full list of principles can be found here.At a press teleconference this afternoon, AdvaMed President Stephen Ubl said the organization has three key points:1. Comparative effectiveness data can have value, but individual judgements for individual decisions must remain.2. Any decision-making process that incorporates comparative effectiveness data should focus on clinical effectiveness instead of cost effectiveness. Otherwise, patients might have to undergo treatments that are cost effective but clinically inferior.3. All stakeholders -- industry, doctors, patients, payors -- need to have input into these policies.

Sign up for the QMED & MD+DI Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like