| Medtech Issues in the 2012 Election Year |
Speaking at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) in San Francisco, Pulitzer Prize–winning political commentator George Will addressed what he labeled “the spreading web of dependency” that is choking the country.
Every 10 seconds, the U.S, government borrows another half a million dollars, explained George Will at the AAOS keynote. Quoting Hemingway, he explained that “there are two ways to go bankrupt. Gradually and suddenly.” And we are “headed towards the suddenly part,” he said.
![]() |
| George Will spoke out against the "spreading web of dependency" in the United States at AAOS. |
Taxing the wealthy, which has been proposed as a solution to this financial problem, is a bad idea, he said. “A country that has lost $7.4 trillion in home equity needs more than a fiddle like that,” he said, explaining that if all of the wealth of billionaires in the country was confiscated, it would not pay six months of the country’s debt.
The government is larger than most people understand it to be. One fifth of American personal income is derived from the government. “There are twice as many government workers as there are people working in manufacturing.”
And much of this government debt is fueled by medical expenses. Before the healthcare reform legislation was passed, 50 cents of every healthcare dollar was from the government, he said.
Every day, from now to 2030, 10,000 more Baby Boomers become eligible for Medicare and Social Security. Five years ago, Will turned 65 and received a Medicare card. “I showed it to my doctor who said, ‘That is wonderful George, now we’ll send your bills to your children.’” That may have been a joke but it is, however, how the welfare state works, he said.
The problem is becoming more urgent as the population gets older. In particular, it is especially expensive to take care of the “very old.” The average cost of taking care of an 85 year old is five times higher than the average costs of a 55 year old.
![]() |
| Image from FlickR user CarbonNYC |
And there are fewer people to support the elderly financially. In 1940, there were 42 workers for every retiree. Today, there are 3.1 workers for every retiree. And by the time the Baby Boomers have retired, assuming that migrant workers continue to come to this country at a sustainable rate, there will be 2.1 workers for every retiree.
“We need economic growth to throw off the revenues used to fund the welfare state to avoid the most predictable crisis in American history,” Will said. And the real problem behind this is medicine, which is “swallowing the federal budget.”
While medicine has progressed amazingly over the decades, at has come increasingly expensive. Will pointed out that he was born in a hospital in Illinois whose biggest expense was clean linen. Without things like MRI machines and expensive prescriptions, healthcare was relatively inexpensive. But, now, the country is spending close to 20% of GDP on healthcare.
One of the main problems behind the out-of-control costs in medical care are muddled incentives, Will argued. Only 12 cents of every healthcare dollar is paid by for the person receiving the healthcare, he said. “The other 88 cents is spent by someone else.”
This expains why Americans have a "buffet attitude" towards the healthcare system. “Someone else is paying, let’s eat all the shrimp.” Practically no one goes to the doctor and asks how much a procedures and tests cost. “Most Americans don’t know, don’t care, and wouldn’t find out even if they could.”
While the government is growing larger in size, fewer people are paying for it. Will pointed out that under the current tax plan:
“60% of Americans pay either no income tax or less than 5% of their income in taxes,” he said. It is a moral hazard that incentivizes perverse behavior. “Most people are supported by a government they aren’t paying for.” He quoted Margaret Thatcher, who said that the problem with welfare is that, sooner or later, you run out of someone else’s money.
And the tax code, as it is now set up, is expensive to enforce. “The people employed to enforce tax code compliance requires more people than the nation’s five largest employers.”
Will criticized the notion that China is somehow to blame for robbing the United States of jobs. “If China disappeared, the jobs wouldn’t come back to this country. They would go to Malaysia, or Vietnam, Thailand or somewhere else.”
A better solution to our economic problems is for entrepreneurs to identify unmet needs. For instance, consider the case of Amazon, eBay, Yahoo, or Google, which, when they were launched, provided functions that did not exist at that time.
In the manufacturing sector, the United States now employs six million people less than it did in the 1970s. But, while it has lost workers in this sector, it has gained efficiency. With fewer workers, the United States now has 2.5 times the manufacturing output. We manufacture more than China does with one tenth of the workforce
“The American people invariably do the right thing... After they have exhausted all of the alternatives.” |
While many people in this country have grown pessimistic because of the political malaise and budget problems, things will likely get better, Will said. As Winston Churchill once explained, “The American people invariably do the right thing... After they have exhausted all of the alternatives.”
All the country needs to do is to choose to get better and work to make it happen. “I think we are about to make a whole bunch of intelligent decisions.” Will predicts that the country would realize “that a benevolent government is not always a benefactor” and that capitalism not only makes us better off, but makes us better morally. That is, it inspires hard work and progress. “Americans understand that the one thing that you can do for your country is to preserve a spacious portion of life for which your country is not responsible.” He backed this assertion up by loosely quoting Robert Frost, stating “I don’t want to live in a democratized society. I want the cream to rise.”
George Will at AAOS
Wow. Speaking as one of the bottom 50% who pays taxes at a 39% rate, I'm a little offended. And, to say that we don't think about what we pay for medical care is crazy. With increased health insurance rates, we are denied more services and access to new drugs every year (and pay more for it). He is right that China is not the problem; big business going offshore anywhere for everything is part of the problem. . . very shortsighted.
Paying for Medical Care
As for the points in the article made about tax, I believe he was referring to the total share paid by various demographics of income earners--not the percent paid but those individuals.
I understand your point about paying for medical care. I think the point he was making was that the matter of who pays for what has become so muddled and unclear, it is difficult for a single party to curb costs. Plus, the fee-for-service model incentivizes volume over all else. And hospitals are incentivized to perform certain procedures that are profitable for them. In addition, there is a great deal of cash spent on things that don't either work or things that don't work very well. Medicines that treat depression, for instance, don't work that well for a sizable portion of the population they are designed to treat. The practice of medicine, while it has advanced tremendously in the last 50 years, is often still of the one-size-fits-all variety.
George Will?
So when did a political commentator become an expert on health care? George has always been a conservative "small government" hack. As much as he is promoted by the TV network as their token conservative, he is a critic - not a problem solver. It's easy to point out flaws where they exist and pick and chose those you wish to highlight, but notice other than some polyanna-ish comments like "we are about to make a whole bunch of intelligent decisions" [and just what are these decisions, George? And WHO is going to make them?], and a kind of personal mantra about self-protection from your country [contrast with JFK's remarks about asking what you can do for your country], George really has no positive contribution to make. So maybe he should just zip it and let those courageous individuals who are actually "in the arena" and wrestling with the difficult decisions do their job and go off to his "spacious portion of life" wherever that is and let those who will engage and help solve the problems do their job without his sniping.
Re: Medicine Is Swallowing the Federal Budget
George may be correct that the assets of the rich wouldn't pay for much of the federal budget, but he makes it sounds like an "either/or" choice. Taxing the super-wealthy at a higher rate will help in the long term. If I were drowning in debt, giving up my daily Starbucks wouldn't make much of a dent, but maybe I should do it anyway?
As for healthcare, I'm sure George is grateful that he survived infancy and childhood without any of the serious diseases that hospitals in 1940 couldn't do much about except provide clean linen. And I'm also sure he'll do his part to reduce health care expenses by refusing an MRI and modern treatment if he gets cancer, and simply going home to die like they did in the past.